02 September 2008

Siapa ajar kita jadi MUSUH?

Malas nak mengumpat dalam bulan Ramadhan ni, tapi tak tahan pula bila terbaca kisah "RACIST" Ketua Umno Bukit Bendera. Sebenarnya bukan sekali dua kita dengar cakap cakap begini, tinggal nak ambil pakai atau tidak.

Perasan atau tidak, memang UMNO ajar kita bersikap RASICT atau lebih sedap didengari PERKAUMAN. Sedar atau tidak, kita ini seringkali diajar secara langsung untuk mengangkat dan menjulang Bangsa Melayu, bukan Martabat Orang Melayu. Ada dua perbezaan di situ, kita angkat bangsa atau maruah bangsa??? Kalau tengok pada perjuangan menjulang keris si UMNO ni, memang tak lari dalam menyedapkan tembolok sendiri. Apa nak jadi ni?

Lihat pada intipati luarnya, wahhhhhhh manis bila berbicara, kalau iklan tu siap ada tag 'MALAYSIA TRULY ASIA'. Gambar siap berbilang warna kulit, berbilang kenegerian tapi hakikatnya tak kita sedar bahawa kita ditindas sedalam dalamnya oleh mereka. Itu sekadar menarik perhatian dunia luar, selebihnya kita tak di layan seperti yang digambarkan. Ini barulah kena dengan pepatah, kera di hutan disusukan sedang anak dirumah mati tak makan.

Dalam Malaysia ni, Melayu sendiri tikam Melayu, Melayu sendiri rompak harta Melayu, Melayu sendiri Membelit orang Melayu. Kenapa dangkal benar benak mereka yang disuap dengan gula gula getah dari UMNO ni? Malu melihat bangsa sendiri dipijak oleh bangsanya sendiri tanpa disedari.

Usahlah di beza bezakan dengan warna kulit, tanah ini milik orang Melayu dan semua keturunan yang sudah wujud di zaman purba kala lagi. Kalau nak kata Cina tu menumpang, India tu merempat di tanah milik Melayu ini, apa hebat sangatkah Melayu di tanah Melayu sendiri?

Jangan jadikan bangsa sebagai permusuhan, yang sudah berlalu tetap menjadi sejarah dan kita tidak boleh menghukum rakyat hari ini dengan kesan sejarah yang lalu. Jangan ajar aku dan generasiku bagaimana rupanya keris milik Melayu. Jangan ajar aku macam mana nak bertutur dalam Bahasa Melayu. Jangan sekali kali ajar aku berpencak dengan manis bahasa jijikmu kerna aku lebih tahu apa itu MELAYU dari kamu yang menjulang keris sedang akal kosong belaka.

Aku pencinta Bangsa, jangan ajar aku jadi MUSUH untuk kepetingan kamu!

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

kita diajar menjadi seorang racis dari sejak kecil lagi, secara kita sedar atau tidak sehingga kita menjadi benci cina dan india, tok2 kita selalu cerita 13 mei salah cina, tapi kena tanya diri sendiri juga, kalau kita tak sama naik, takan berlaku tumpah darah. buat nak kata sapa-sapa tumpang, yang penting kita sendiri belum tentu orang tanah melayu yang asli, orang asli pun tak pernah mengamuk kalau tanah adat kena amik sebab sapa yang nak pertahankan mereka?

Rakan2
Jangan Lupa layari blog saya di http://khairilazuar.wordpress.com
bagi komen setiap artikel yang saya tulis. …ada artikel baru

Anonymous said...

CAN DEMOCRACY ACTUALLY GUARANTEE US FREEDOM???

CAN WE LEARN SOMETHING FROM THE AMERICAN EXPERIENCE ….

read on
————————————————————————————

What’s the Meaning of ‘Freedom’? …. But don’t ask a politician!

by Rep. Ron Paul

“Man is not free unless government is limited. There’s a clear cause and effect here that is as neat and predictable as a law of physics: As government expands, liberty contracts”.

- Ronald Reagan

We’ve all heard the words democracy and freedom used countless times, especially in the context of our invasion of Iraq. They are used interchangeably in modern political discourse, yet their true meanings are very different. George Orwell (picture above right) wrote about “meaningless words” that are endlessly repeated in the political arena. Words like “freedom,” “democracy,” and “justice,” Orwell explained, have been abused so long that their original meanings have been eviscerated. In Orwell’s view, political words are “often used in a consciously dishonest way.” Without precise meanings behind words, politicians and elites can obscure reality and condition people to reflexively associate certain words with positive or negative perceptions. In other words, unpleasant facts can be hidden behind purposely meaningless language.

As a result, Americans have been conditioned to accept the word “democracy” as a synonym for freedom, and thus to believe that democracy is unquestionably good. The problem is that democracy is not freedom. Democracy is simply majoritarianism, which is inherently incompatible with real freedom. Our founding fathers clearly understood this, as evidenced not only by our republican constitutional system, but also by their writings in the Federalist Papers and elsewhere. James Madison cautioned that under a democratic government, “There is nothing to check the inducement to sacrifice the weaker party or the obnoxious individual.” John Adams argued that democracies merely grant revocable rights to citizens depending on the whims of the masses, while a republic exists to secure and protect preexisting rights.

Yet how many Americans know that the word “democracy” is found neither in the Constitution nor the Declaration of Independence, our very founding documents? A truly democratic election in Iraq, without U.S. interference and U.S. puppet candidates, almost certainly would result in the creation of a Shi’ite theocracy. Shi’ite majority rule in Iraq might well mean the complete political, economic, and social subjugation of the minority Kurd and Sunni Arab populations. Such an outcome would be democratic, but would it be free? Would the Kurds and Sunnis consider themselves free? The administration talks about democracy in Iraq, but is it prepared to accept a democratically elected Iraqi government no matter what its attitude toward the U.S. occupation? Hardly. For all our talk about freedom and democracy, the truth is we have no idea whether Iraqis will be free in the future.

They’re certainly not free while a foreign army occupies their country. The real test is not whether Iraq adopts a democratic, pro-Western government, but rather whether ordinary Iraqis can lead their personal, religious, social, and business lives without interference from government. Simply put, freedom is the absence of government coercion. Our Founding Fathers understood this, and created the least coercive government in the history of the world. The Constitution established a very limited, decentralized government to provide national defense and little else. States, not the federal government, were charged with protecting individuals against criminal force and fraud. For the first time, a government was created solely to protect the rights, liberties, and property of its citizens.

Any government coercion beyond that necessary to secure those rights was forbidden, both through the Bill of Rights and the doctrine of strictly enumerated powers. This reflected the founders’ belief that democratic government could be as tyrannical as any King. Few Americans understand that all government action is inherently coercive. If nothing else, government action requires taxes. If taxes were freely paid, they wouldn’t be called taxes, they’d be called donations. If we intend to use the word freedom in an honest way, we should have the simple integrity to give it real meaning: Freedom is living without government coercion. So when a politician talks about freedom for this group or that, ask yourself whether he is advocating more government action or less. The political left equates freedom with liberation from material wants, always via a large and benevolent government that exists to create equality on earth.

To modern liberals, men are free only when the laws of economics and scarcity are suspended, the landlord is rebuffed, the doctor presents no bill, and groceries are given away. But philosopher Ayn Rand (and many others before her) demolished this argument by explaining how such “freedom” for some is possible only when government takes freedoms away from others. In other words, government claims on the lives and property of those who are expected to provide housing, medical care, food, etc. for others are coercive?and thus incompatible with freedom. “Liberalism,” which once stood for civil, political, and economic liberties, has become a synonym for omnipotent coercive government. The political right equates freedom with national greatness brought about through military strength.

Like the left, modern conservatives favor an all-powerful central state? but for militarism, corporatism, and faith-based welfarism. Unlike the Taft-Goldwater conservatives of yesteryear, today’s Republicans are eager to expand government spending, increase the federal police apparatus, and intervene militarily around the world. The last tenuous links between conservatives and support for smaller government have been severed. “Conservatism,” which once meant respect for tradition and distrust of active government, has transformed into big-government utopian grandiosity. Orwell certainly was right about the use of meaningless words in politics. If we hope to remain free, we must cut through the fog and attach concrete meanings to the words politicians use to deceive us.

We must reassert that America is a republic, not a democracy, and remind ourselves that the Constitution places limits on government that no majority can overrule. We must resist any use of the word “freedom” to describe state action. We must reject the current meaningless designations of “liberals” and “conservatives,” in favor of an accurate term for both: statists. Every politician on earth claims to support freedom. The problem is so few of them understand the simple meaning of the word.

Merdeka!!!

Anonymous said...

JGN SALAHKAN UMNO...

UMNO ADA 2...UMNO BARU UMNO LAMA...
UMNO BARU YG DIBAWA OLEH TUN M..
TERCETUS SELEPAS SEMANGAT 46 TUBUH.

UMNO LAMA ADALAH PEJUANG BANGSA YG TULEN....PENCETUS PERJUANGAN NEGARA

-CHECKMATE

Anonymous said...

UMNO LER PENGKIANAT BANGSA MR CHEQUEMAKE ..PENYAMUN..PERTUALANG..CONTOH KAT RTM SLOT PENYIARAN HABIS DISAKAU UNTUK 2 TAHUN MENTERI PI BAGI KAT KRONI..PRODUCTION HOUSE NAK MASUK TAK DAPAT, SLOT DAH HABIS..!! SO KEADAAN EKONOMI MAKIN TERUK..ENGKAU PUN TAU DIKALANGAN PRODUCTION HOUSE ORANG MELAYU LAA YG PALING RAMAI..ARTIS PUN ORG MELAYU LAA PALING RAMAI..!! TAMAK PUNYA PASAI, PI BELI CITE INDON & DLL..PASAI MURAH..N TAK REMEH KEPALA NAK GI SHOOTING..JANJI MASYUK..!! KALO BETUL IKHLAS KETUANAN MELAYU WAHAI ORANG X2 UMNO..TAK TERFIKIR KE KO..NASIB PENGKARYA, PENGIAT SENI DIKALANGAN ORANG X2 MELAYU YG KO HENDAK MEMARTABATKAN TU..?? MACAM MANA DEPA NAK HIDUP ASIK LEPAS KO ENGKAU JE YG SAKAU..?? macam mana wehh orang melayu nak maju..kalo penyangaknya dikalangan pemimpin melayu yg diamanahkan memimpin orang x2 melayu..KORANG INGAT ORANG MELAYU NII BODOH KE..TAK NAMPAK KEEE..?? ELOK TUKAU JE KETUANAN MELAYU KEPADA LANUN MELAYU